name | overriden joins | percentage | influences | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | Socialist | 1 | 0.1 | # | StateEmployees,0.2 | TradeUnionist,0.25 | |||
# | Capitalist | 1 | 0.25 | # | TradeUnionist,-0.25 | SelfEmployed,0.2 | |||
# | Retired | 0 | 0.19 | # | Commuter,-1.0 | SelfEmployed,-1.0 | StateEmployees, -1.0 | Parents,-1.0 | Young,-1.0 |
# | Commuter | 0 | 0.7 | # | Retired,-1.0 | ||||
# | Patriot | 0 | 0.1 | # | EthnicMinorities,-0.2 | ||||
# | Motorist | 0 | 0.32 | # | Environmentalist,-0.2 | ||||
# | Liberal | 1 | 0.27 | # | Religious,-0.2 | Environmentalist,0.1 | Young,0.15 | Retired,-0.15 | |
# | Religious | 0 | 0.05 | # | |||||
# | TradeUnionist | 0 | 0.2 | # | SelfEmployed,-1.0 | ||||
# | SelfEmployed | 0 | 0.15 | # | StateEmployees,-1.0 | TradeUnionist,-1.0 | Retired,-1.0 | ||
# | Environmentalist | 0 | 0.09 | # | Motorist,-0.2 | ||||
# | Wealthy | 1 | 0.09 | # | |||||
# | Poor | 1 | 0.25 | # | |||||
# | MiddleIncome | 1 | 0.41 | # | |||||
# | Parents | 0 | 0.37 | # | Retired, -1.0 | ||||
# | Farmers | 0 | 0.08 | # | Commuter,-1.0 | Retired,-1.0 | |||
# | StateEmployees | 0 | 0 | # | SelfEmployed,-1.0 | ||||
# | Conservatives | 1 | 0.24 | # | Religious,0.25 | Environmentalist,-0.1 | Retired,0.15 | Young,-0.15 | |
# | Young | 0 | 0.17 | # | Retired,-1.0 | Environmentalist,0.15 | |||
# | EthnicMinorities | 0 | 0.3 | # | Patriot,-0.2 | ||||
# | _All_ |
1 | 1 | # |
The table shown above is a section of votertypes.csv in the game. These ‘influences’ modifiers are assumed to be similar to other ordinary membership modifiers with a unique difference - it’s only effective to those who are in that voter group. For example, TradeUnionist,0.25
in the ‘Socialist’ line means only socialist voters are going to have +25% higher membership, possibly leading to more trade unionists among socialists.
While it’d be very glad if I can target those conditional membership variables with influence links, I understand that it would be quite complicated to grasp at first glance. Still, I think introducing such elements to each missions can lead to interesting results. Some countries might have considerably more self-employed voters in the poor group. The retired in other countries may be more liberal/conservative because of historic backgrounds. The poor may be more patriotic in EU countries. And many more.
Any chance this can be made available?