The fact that the option of using both flat taxes and (progressive) income tax has now been removed has brought the difficulty of budget-managing into sharper focus. While for now it seems feasible to still do well at the game even with a Debt Crisis, I’m guessing that this will change with balancing to make the game more difficult and anyway I’d still like to avoid a debt crisis if I can! So this has led me to try and understand better the game mechanics. Either I would be helped by some explanation or it needs to be made clearer in game (or both!):
Especially when playing as Germany (where monetary policy isn’t available - not that I’ve fully got my head around precisely what the mechanics are for the monetary policies), sometimes one wants to reduce the deficit / balance the budget without increasing taxes or cutting spending. But I don’t presently think the effects of using spending to increase the country’s income base are all that clear.
-
In the game, if I - for example - introduce a state health service or free childcare, then this increases national income by reducing unemployment, right?
-
We can see by how much unemployment will be reduced when introducing the policy, but it’s not obvious how that translates into how much increased national income. Am I missing something?
-
Does introducing an unemployment-reducing policy have any effect when unemployment is already at the very bottom of the graph? If my new policy says, for example, that it reduces unemployment by 5%, is that just wrong and to be ignored if I’m already at the bottom of the unemployment graph? If so, does that then mean that the policy can’t increase my national income?
-
Similar questions when it comes to policies that increase GDP. For example Science spending increases GDP. That seems to mean increasing Science spending increases national income, right?
-
Any way of knowing by how much increasing science spending by 50% (for example) would increase national income?
-
If GDP is already at the top of the graph, then does eg increasing science spending have any effect in increasing national income?
-
In a situation where GDP is at the top of the graph and unemployment is at the bottom, does increasing spending on for example state schools have any effect on national income (ordinarily it would reduce unemployment and boost GDP indirectly through increased education and productivity etc)?
-
If no, then if there is no further national-income increase to be gained from raising GDP or lowering unemployment, then presumably there is no way to lower a deficit other than cutting spending or raising taxes (which can of course have counter-productive effects)?
I guess these sorts of issues are more pertinent if you’re playing in a socialist style, but I don’t think it’s an accident that presently the global averages for almost all countries are that people are winning elections playing as liberal capitalists… I will have to see if printing money makes deficit management any easier, but that’s not an option for eurozone countries anyway…