Who said absolute “freedom of speech” has to always have a beneficial effect on society? This is amongst its drawbacks.
I don’t want to keep stacking negative situations in game (when we should actually be looking for positive ones as well), but depopulation can be serious problem in some cases, like a “pensions crisis”. Ratio workers to retirees. This can of course be balanced by increased productivity per worker and increased automation (but can it endlessly be the solution? I hesitate to think so).
Pensions crisis - Wikipedia
Depopulation Positive and Negative Effects
[Population decline - Wikipedia] (Positive) (Population decline - Wikipedia)
[Population decline - Wikipedia] (Negative) (Population decline - Wikipedia)
Currently, for how the game is structured population growth has mostly positive effects (although not full, as tax is not tied to population size) and underpopulation (population decline) does not have much of an impact in the game, negative or positive outside of increased emigration.
With reference to negative news media (MWS), The Guardian has a “upside” column for dealing with solely positive news, but when you look at the scale of negative news and the negative/mocking tone present in many guardian articles (rightly or wrongly), the scale dwarves the positive news, even with a dedicated section. This is just an example.
A major driver of the dissolution of the Soviet Union was the very “openness” he talked about. The economy was stagnating along for a few years before gorbie and there were bad things which happened in the Soviet Union, but when the era of (relative) “openness” brought about the airing of the many wrongs which happened in the past, people just lost faith in the Soviet Union, that was probably the straw that broke the camel’s back.
That’s probably a major reason why China is still here today, how many Han Chinese know of the full knowledge of the Uyghur Genocide within their own borders, if they don’t have access to foreign news sources? Or how many Indians know of the genocide against the muslim kashmiris in India, or even the more well-known hindu exodus and genocide from kashmir (even if it is what the Indian government wants people to focus on), people are too busy with survival that most don’t even pay attention to the news which the government wants them to pay attention to and rally around, unless it affects them and their group personally (although that has more of an effect than what the government doesn’t want you to know).
Human rights abuses in Kashmir - Wikipedia
Exodus of Kashmiri Hindus - Wikipedia
Creating fear is something both government and non-government entities are good at.