Okay, I would ask that anyone reading this post hears me out before posting rashly and only having read half of what I’ve said. This’ll get a bit multi-layered I suspect.
First of all, I felt I got my money’s worth out of the game. It’s an enjoyable little game and it does indeed have a lot to it. Moreover, I’m really quite impressed with the community here. There are a lot of intelligent folks around and we even have the developer himself listening, taking suggestions and noting bugs to fix. Do you have any idea how rare that is? I’m going to keep an eye on future Positech products for those reasons alone.
Now then, to shift gears, under normal circumstances, a refund would be possible, yes. There are trade laws which say that if a person isn’t satisfied with the goods they’ve received (which has nothing to do with defective goods), then they may return the goods, undamaged, to their store of origin for a replacement, an exchange or a refund.
However, these are anything but normal circumstances.
The game was bought online, asking for a refund is basically the same as asking for a free game. The laws don’t cover stuff like this and this would be something for a court to decide (no, I’m not suggesting you go to court). The reason for this is that you can’t “return” the goods. The goods stay with you regardless, you could keep them. There’s no way for cliff to ensure that you won’t keep the goods as pirated software after you’ve received a refund. That’s the catch 22 with downloadable software.
That’s why, if there’s a demo available you should always play the demo first, exhaustively.
Now Positech has been very good natured in this, I can’t really fault them. Their demo is fully featured and has a good number of turns. It’s easy enough to see a lot of the game by the demo alone by playing more efficiently within each allotment of turns or trying different things.
I don’t think that a refund is a really apt solution in this case because there is a demo available and there’s no way to return the goods so I think it would be unreasonable to ask. Though for future use, Cliff might want to put a ‘no refunds due to the nature of digital software’ notice (possibly in legalese) up on the site’s main page. That’d help avoid confusion like this in the future.
Just my thoughts, anyway.