Religious Subsidies increase racial tension, this has the unfortunate implication that all religious teaching is bigoted and discrimnatory and all the Religious are just racist and ethno-nationalist?
Make the middle class less prickly, currently upset about too many things?
Since the classical eras, religions have peacefully, and even productively co-existed interculturally. Of all times in history for that to be possible, one would hope such a thing could be realised in the present, or at least in a game of such suspensions of disbelief that it allows for the realisation of a nation of fully self-driving transportation.
Progressive leanings have worked hard to celebrate and reform spiritualities in the 21st century, as its modern members have worked to evolve them into more inclusive institutions from the inside.
The Randian intellectual abhorrence for faith is a contradiction of its own liberalism. This faux-rationalist edgelord’s moody atheism has run it’s course. The democratic world hinges on the right to freedom of religion. It is a recursive nuance of fascism to scapegoat it.
The human belief in the unseen is endemic and comprehensive, whether theistic or not. It hasn’t gone away in 20,000 years. But it has, and will continue to evolve.
Remember that conservatism/patriotism and religion doesn’t mean the same thing, so , why does the game portray some of the religious policies as racist?
My issue is moreso with the outputs of the policy itself, as the voter groups are pretty complex with multiple interest groups feeding into a person’s voting intention.