“White Genocide Encouragement”? That can’t be a progressive policy, surely.
I’m not exactly sure what you’re trying to say here.
We’re talking about political radicalism. My suggestions were grouped into two pairings: actual leftist radical measures and the absurdist conspiracy theories the left-wing is accused of believing in.
As the link explains, white genocide is a right-wing conspiracy theory strawmanned out of a fear of cultural sensitivity and pro-immigration measures. The conspiracy theory, alongside the term ‘woke’ itself, have increasingly been wielded as sensationalist moral panics by the centre-right, much as was the case with the term ‘political correctness’ in the late 20th century. Both terms eventually came to mean very little beyond political dogwhistling.
So, what are you proposing? Some political correctness, whether conservative or liberal, does have a chilling affect on free speech.
I’m afraid to ask if this happens in real life.
I feel like that would just be classified as murder at that point.
Abortion means if it’s still inside the womb, right?
yes, I believe that’s the definition people use.
No, another conservative strawman. Normal abortion is too reasonable a concept to abhor, so populism derives shock porn to object to. It’s how you end up with zealots bombing clinics convinced they’re doing the right thing.
Point is, if we’ve got racial profiling, death penalty, women driving bans and the illegalisation of queer identities in the game, I’d love to see the inverse. Portlandia levels of farce. Crazy liberal and socialist laws exist out there too!
Government-sponsored Eugenics program. Boosted by spending in cloning and genetics research. Depresses population, and lessens the impact of overcrowding on the country.
Wouldn’t rugenics boost the population, it’s baically asking one group of people to have more children?
I was more thinking along the lines of “removing” bad genetics from the population. Everyone else can have children normally.
Although alternatively, it can be reducing the birth rates of “undesirable” people.
Live Ammunition for protests.
Warning shots at minimum, indiscriminate at maximum.
(This is present in a few democracies today, most likely in their restive areas)
yes, thats exactly what it is.
So, it would balance out? I guess that would depend on the number of “desirable” v “undesirable”.
well why would it? if the birth rate of “desirable” people aren’t increased then the overall population growth rate would slow.
I guess it would depend on how you would implement it.